Search Results (1 to 10 of 11100 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3679 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1757 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1098 JMIR Formative Research
- 908 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 500 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 494 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 407 JMIR Mental Health
- 365 JMIR Human Factors
- 313 JMIR Serious Games
- 271 JMIR Medical Education
- 154 JMIR Aging
- 146 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 140 JMIR Cancer
- 131 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 100 JMIR Infodemiology
- 81 JMIR Diabetes
- 78 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 62 JMIRx Med
- 61 JMIR AI
- 60 JMIR Cardio
- 51 JMIR Nursing
- 49 JMIR Dermatology
- 45 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 30 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 26 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 21 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 15 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 12 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 11 Iproceedings
- 11 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 10 Medicine 2.0
- 8 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 3 JMIR Data
- 3 JMIRx Bio
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
In 2017, Jo PM joined JMIR Publications as a peer-reviewed, open access journal to advance the science of participatory care (also referred to as coproduction and co-design). Published papers mirror the 15-year shift in relationships between patients, their health information, and their providers.
Health professionals often overestimate the risks of e-patients (patients and caregivers online) and underestimate their value [18].
J Particip Med 2025;17:e75794
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A recent paper described how studies involving sensitive data, when conducted without formal ethical review, can lead to public misinformation, erode trust in science, and undermine institutional credibility [4]. These concerns are especially relevant in digital health, where existing company practices and policies, such as internal review processes or general user agreements, may not sufficiently address the ethical complexities of data use, highlighting the need for more robust forms of oversight.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70711
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mobile apps are a popular approach in translational science in behavioral health interventions [24,25], demonstrating some success in changing dietary patterns [26]. Effective dissemination, implementation, and translational science, however, hinges on community engagement, where the target population is engaged in all processes from problem identification to design and implementation of interventions [27].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70104
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A wide array of LLMs is now accessible, including open-source models, offering solutions that cater to both the public and medical professionals [1,4].
The efficacy of these models has been demonstrated in a variety of tasks, albeit with some limitations [5,6]. For instance, LLMs, such as GPT, have shown promise in providing diagnostic assistance and answering medical queries [5,7-9].
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e66917
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A link to a Microsoft Forms survey allowed the validation of the illustration map by each participant anonymously, where either the option “I agree with the visual summary” or the option “I do not agree with the visual summary,” followed by an open text field for feedback, could be chosen (Multimedia Appendices 10 and 11). The response rate for the validation was 77%, with 17 participants completing the survey.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e65759
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A comprehensive search was conducted in 6 databases—Pub Med, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Psyc Info—to identify qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with COPD or asthma using EIMDs. Electronic monitoring equipment for inhalation devices was first reported in 1983 [28]. To maximize the inclusion of relevant reports, this search covered publications from January 1983 through July 2024.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57645
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Power-Assist Add-Ons for Older Adult Manual Wheelchair Users: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Our review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework [13] and will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sc R) checklist extension for Scoping Reviews [14]. We will use the scoping review framework originally developed by Arksey and O’Malley [15] and incorporate additional refinements recommended by Levac et al [16].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e56375
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review
The review protocol was registered in January 2024 on the Open Science Framework Registries [39]. The PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework [37] was followed as a guide to construct the review objectives, search strategy, and eligibility criteria. Covidence systematic review software was used for all review stages [40].
The principal reviewer (BMT) and second reviewer (EP) developed the search strategy, with assistance from a university research librarian.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71140
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
By using implementation science methods, an innovative and comprehensive educational protocol was developed for health care workers in Nebraska that integrates the training curriculum, evaluation metrics, and coaching support, allowing the translation of the training into actionable health care/community projects focused on addressing health disparities. This model has shown initial promise in terms of feasibility and uptake.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60901
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We (JG, SN, and CB) created a topic guide to generate open responses. We developed our guide using Krueger and Casey’s [49] approach to FG guides, Helfferich’s methods [50], the TAM [40,41], and the UTAUT [42].
Participants were asked the following questions:
What factors would make you more or less likely to accept an AI system in medical care?
What challenges do you see for a successful use of AI in medical care?
Where do you see potential applications for AI in medical care, and where don’t?
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70487
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS